Biggest Celebrity Real Estate Losers

The Biggest Celebrity Losers

Even celebrity home prices have hit rock bottom.

1. Suzanne Somers

Was: $35 million

Now: $12.9 million

Along with hubbie Alan Hamel, Somers has been working on this huge, 65-acre desert compound outside Palm Springs since 1977. "Les Baux de Palm Springs" mixes the charm of the French countryside with Hollywood touches like Zebra skin rugs (lots of 'em) and massive chandeliers. Even after dropping the price by more than $22 million this property is still on the market, with the current price "available upon request". (Source)

2. Nicolas Cage

Was: $35 million

Now: $17.5 million

Are there any mega-celebrities out there who live in simple, tasteful homes? Certainly not Nicolas Cage, whose old-Hollywood tudor in Bel Air reminds us of the sprawling Xanadu compound from "Citizen Kane". Actually, it's not so much the house as the crap it's filled with. Anyone want a life-sized Mickey Mouse? How about a boulder-sized amethyst geode? The good news is that the property is now being offered at a 50% discount. Anyone got seventeen-and-a-half million bucks lying around? UPDATE: Is this house about to be auctioned off on the courthouse steps? Has Cage defaulted on his mortgage? (Source)

3. Eddie Murphy

Was: $30 million

Now: $14.99 million

Eddie Murphy's seven-bedroom Englewood, NJ mansion known as "Bubble Hill" may be only ten minutes outside of Manhattan, but that doesn't mean he's had an easy time finding a buyer. Bubble Hill has been on the market for at least 5 years. Pro: it's got a bowling alley and a recording studio. Cons: $200k a year in property taxes. UPDATE: Looks like this house keeps dropping! 12.75 million and falling fast. (Source)

4. Mel Gibson

Was: $39.5 million

Now: $29.5 million

Another celebrity gets divorced, another mega-Tudor hits the market! This Greenwich, CT mansion was designed by architect Charles Lewis Bowman and built in 1926. It's actually a very tasteful home (we're glaring at you, Nic Cage), if you can get over the fact that Mel Gibson has a reputation for being a huge prick. You know you're a jerk when you drop the price of your house by $10 million but still nobody wants to buy it. UPDATE: Looks like somebody finally bought this place, though the purchase price remains undisclosed. (Source)

5. Hugh Hefner

Was: $27.995 million

Now: $18 million

Why did it take nearly 6 months and a ten million dollar price drop to sell this home? Are there not enough wealthy, single men out there who would pay almost anything for a pimp shack adjacent to the Playboy Mansion? Let me repeat that: you can literally stroll over to the Playboy Mansion in your silk pj's for a round of Texas Hold 'Em with the bunnies. We truly live in strange times. (Source)

6. 50 Cent

Was: $18.5 million

Now: $10.9 million

Mike Tyson. 50 Cent. You. What, you don't think you can fill shoes that big? 50 Cent reportedly spent $10 million on renovations alone fixing up this Farmington, CT mega-mansion that he purchased from Mike Tyson's ex-wife. I guess there aren't many people looking for 52 rooms... one real estate agent went on record saying he'd be surprised if this place sells for more than $5 million. Ouch. (Source)

7. Richard Gere

Was: $17.995 million

Now: $11 million

It's no secret that Julian Schnabel's Palazzo Chupi units at 360 West 11th Street in Manhattan's West Village have sold poorly. (The units that have sold at all!) Only one big-name sucker took the plunge: Richard Gere. But the star of "Pretty Woman" and "Chicago" never even moved in before the apartment was re-listed at nearly $18 million. More than a year - and several price drops - later, the place finally sold for $11 million. (Source)

8. Burt Reynolds

Was: $15 million

Now: $8.995 million

This old stallion may not regularly trim his famously thick body hair, but he certainly knows how to trim the asking price on his Hobe Sound, FL mansion. The listing has already dropped by about 40%, but without a buyer look for it to continue heading southward. This Mediterranean-style compound borders a wildlife refuge, so watch out for alligators if you take a tour. (Source)

9. Meg Ryan

Was: $19.5 million

Now: $14.2 million

Unlike Meg Ryan's reconstructed nose, her 1931 Spanish-style estate is practically flawless. A real movie star house, with ocean views and all that good stuff. Celebrity couples David & Victoria Beckham and Ben Affleck & Jennifer Garner reportedly took tours of the house, but no one was willing to fork over nearly $20 million. For $5 million less, though, it's hard to believe that this house is going to be on the market for very long. (Source)

10. Alex Rodriguez

Was: $14.9 million

Now: $10 million

A-Rod had to drop the price of his Trump Park Avenue apartment by $4 million before it sold, but even a price drop of nearly $5 million on his Coral Gables home hasn't lit a fire under buyers' checkbooks. Why sell? Looks like Rodriguez is trying to focus on baseball for once, rather than his well-known extracurricular activities. Or maybe the price of a hot dog and a beer at the new Yankee Stadium is just a little too steep? (Source)

11. Dylan McDermott

Was: $11 million

Now: $6.9 million

By all accounts a beautiful residence, McDermott has had major trouble selling this Spanish hacienda-style home in Brentwood, even with a steep price cut. McDermott picked up the house back in 1999 from Melanie Griffith and Antonio Banderas, who bought it in 1997 from Michelle Pfeiffer and David E. Kelly (creator of "The Practice", in which McDermott had a starring role). I'm not saying I've got the cash, but I'd love to live in this house. (Source)

12. Elle Macpherson

Was: $15.5 million

Now: $12.2 million

The falling price on this seven-story Notting Hill, London residence proves that even the UK is being hit hard by the housing crisis. The Victorian property was built in the 1850s and has six bedrooms. It was first listed in the summer of 2008. (Source)

13. Curt Schilling

Was: $8 million

Now: $5 million

This house has a history of selling for less than what its sports superstar owners would like to charge. When Drew Bledsoe owned this Medfield, MA home he tried to unload it for $9 million, but eventually had to settle for $4.5 from fellow Boston-area hero Curt Schilling. Schilling had been trying to get rid of it for $8 million, then dropped the price to $5 million. Update: the price has dropped again to $4.5 million. I guess that's really what this house is worth? (Source)

14. Dan Marino

Was: $15.9 million

Now: $13.5 million

Marino never won a Super Bowl, and he isn't much of a real estate champion either. He's been trying to unload his Weston, FL compound for nearly four years, dropping the price and throwing in freebies like $1.5 million worth of designer furniture and a signed football. A signed football? Wow! That's worth, like... four hundred bucks. (Source)

15. Scarlett Johansson

Was: $7 million

Now: $5 million

Scarlett Johansson purchased her 1931 Spanish-style home in LA's Outpost Estates neighborhood in 2007 for $7 million bucks. Now it's been listed for just under $5 million... that's $2 million actual dollars that Scarlett is waving goodbye to. Ouch. (Source)

16. Kimora Lee Simmons

Was: $7.8 million

Now: $5.9 million

Kimora may be living "Life in the Fab Lane" as a reality TV star and CEO of Baby Phat, but her real estate woes are the stuff of legend. Along with ex-hubbie Russell Simmons, she's had to drop the price of her Saddle River, NJ home by $7 million. She also cut the price of her own Beverly Hills home by nearly $2 million, but the house has recently been de-listed for lack of an interested buyer. (Source)

17. Lance Armstrong

Was: $12 million

Now: $10.5 million

Armstrong's 447-acre ranch in Dripping Springs, TX includes Deadman's Hole, a beautiful swimming hole that has a giant waterfall. The 7-time Tour de France winner celebrated the birth of his fourth child last year, so maybe he's thinking about keeping the toddler far away from unguarded bodies of water? (Source)

18. Britney Spears

Was: $7.9 million

Now: $6.5 million

Does anyone really have the energy to listen to one more word about Britney Spears? I didn't think so. Let's just call her a (real estate) loser and be done with it. (Source)

19. J-Lo & Mark Anthony

Was: $8.5 million

Now: $7.5 million

Jennifer Lopez and Mark Anthony have sold their understated Bel Air home to a hedge fund manager for $1 million below the asking price. With as much money as they have, do you think they'll even notice? Of course, they were forced to throw in $1.3 million of furniture to close the deal, adding a bit of insult to injury. (Source)

20. Bruce Jenner & Kris Kardashian

Was: $3.4 million

Now: $3.0 million

"Keeping Up with the Kardashians" may be a hit reality TV show, but as we've seen before that hardly insulates you from falling real estate prices. This house was even featured on the first few seasons of the show, but finding a buyer required a 12% price cut. Then again, just like the power couple featured at #19, do you think anyone with the last name Kardashian is going to worry about $400,000? (Source)

HAFA Update

White House "Beefs Up" the HAFA Plan and offers "Unemployment Assistance":

In an announcement today, the White House announced some big changes / improvements to the HAFA plan. The changes are vast and in some cases a huge improvement upon the earlier HAFA version. Key points include:

• Principal Reductions for Underwater Mortgages
• FHA Refinancing for Underwater Mortgages
• Assistance for those who are Unemployed
• HAFA Enhancements
  • Servicer incentives on short sales and deeds-in-lieu from $1,000 to $1,500
  • A doubled payout to 2^nd lien holders from the previous 3% to a 6% cap
  • Servicer incentives for short sales or deeds-in-lieu have also doubled from $1,000 to $2,000
• Servicers are required to "evaluate" Borrower's who have missed "at least" two payments and servicers are not allowed to initiate foreclosure proceedings until it is determined that borrower's are ineligible for HAMP.

One of the best explanations of these updates as well as great links to HAFA related material comes from Carrie Bay of DSNews. Click here for full story.

No Positive Equity until 2020?

This morning, DSNews.com reported that First American CoreLogic's recent study shows that some areas in the U.S. have properties that are in a present negative equity scenario that will not see positive equity until 2020. Many of us knew it would be a while, but 2020? Their stats are based on data extracted from research done in many areas across the U.S.

So what does this mean for us in the real estate industry? Well, firstly, that short sales will be around in some capacity for a long time. Agents that are on the fence about short sales will need to surrender and take the plunge...or face a probable business failure. Agents that have already built up their business by getting certified and helping homeowners sell their upside down properties in the pre-foreclosure state will have a head start.

What does this mean for defaulted or soon to be defaulted homeowners? The study mentioned states that "The latest numbers from First American CoreLogic show that more than 11.3 million, or 24 percent, of all residential properties with mortgages were underwater at the end of the fourth quarter of 2009". Wow! That's almost a quarter of the mortgages in the U.S.! Furthermore, "Among the new housing initiatives announced by the administration Friday was assistance for borrowers with negative equity. In order to deter these homeowners from strategically defaulting, the Treasury will begin requiring servicers to consider principal write-downs as part of their Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) evaluations for borrowers whose loan balance is more than 115 percent of the property’s current value. The plan also includes a Federal Housing Administration (FHA) refinancing program for negative equity mortgages."

Ok, so we are expecting defaulted homeowners to "strategically default" on their loans due to the fact that there is no light at the end of the tunnel...equity speaking. That could create a disasterous effect on the housing market, which is already poised for future foreclosure waves in mass volume. So what is the governments answer to this potential epidemic of massive "strategic defaults"...principal write-downs (reductions) via loan modification for borrowers whose LTV is more than 115%. There is a lot of chatter about these principle write-downs and it will be very interesting to see how this plays itself out. Bank of America unveiled a plan on upside down defaulting HELOC's (that are in junior position) called "Earned Principle Write-doowns". With this program, the borrower would have to make the new modified payment for 5 years before the loan principal would be permanently reduced.

PartnerFirst members, chime in here or in the discussion/open forum area about your thoughts on these matters.

Article Link: http://www.dsnews.com/articles/print-view/how-long-will-negative-equity-last-2010-03-29

Tax Credit for New Home Purchase

Tax Credit for New Home Purchase


This tax credit is available for qualified buyers who on or after March 1, 2009, and before March 1, 2010, purchase a qualified principal residence that has never been occupied. The buyer must reside in the new home for a minimum of two years immediately following the purchase date.

We will accept applications for allocation of credit by fax only (916.845.9754), starting March 1, 2009; however, we will not send notifications of credit allocation until we have developed procedures. Once we begin processing allocation applications, credits will be allocated on a first-come, first-served basis. We will update this page as soon as we begin mailing credit allocation letters. We plan to begin mailing credit allocation letters no later than May 1, 2009. This delay is necessary to allow us time to develop a system to capture and verify the application information, allocate the credits, and send the credit allocation letters. Please be patient with us and do not send applications more than one time.
Tax credit amounts

California allocated $100,000,000 for this tax credit. Buyers must apply for credit allocation from us. Applications will be reviewed and credit allocations will be made on a first-come, first-served basis. Once $100,000,000 has been allocated, the tax credit will no longer be available. Please check this page for updates on the allocated and remaining credits available.
Total credit allocated: $0
Remaining credit available: $100,000,000

Note: The remaining credit amount displayed above only reflects allocations processed. This amount will be updated once we begin mailing credit allocation letters, which is expected to commence by May 1, 2009. This amount does not include applications that have been received, but not yet processed.
Applications for New Home Credit received, but not yet processed through 4/29/09
As of Total Applications received: Total Credit claimed:
3/4/09 173 $ 1,715,826
3/11/09 711 $ 6,987,515
3/18/09 1,188 $ 11,599,825
3/25/09 1,710 $ 16,647,498
4/1/09 2,624 $ 25,578,709
4/8/09 3,135 $ 30,559,124
4/15/09 3,589 $ 34,939,035
4/22/09 4,199 $ 40,879,872
4/29/09 4,880 $ 47,353,795

Graph that shows the figures in the table above

This reflects the total amount of credit reported on applications received as of the date indicated. This amount has not yet been verified and may include duplicate, incomplete, and invalid applications. This amount is provided for informational purposes and does not reflect the actual amount to be allocated. We will update the amount received, but not yet processed, on this webpage each Friday. As we approach the $100,000,000 limitation, we will update the reported amounts on a daily basis. Keep in mind, that all applications will be processed on a first-come, first-served basis, based on the date received by fax only.

California allows qualified new home buyers a total tax credit amount equal to either five percent of the purchase price or $10,000, whichever is less. Taxpayers must apply the total tax credit in equal amounts over three successive taxable years (maximum of $3,333 per year) beginning with the taxable year (2009 or 2010) in which the new home is purchased.
How to apply

* Within one week (seven calendar days) after the close of escrow:
o The seller must complete Part I of Form 3528-A, Application for New Home Credit, certifying that the home has never been occupied, and provide a copy to the buyer or escrow person.
o The buyer will complete Parts II & III of Form 3528-A.
o The escrow person on behalf of the seller and buyer will fax the completed Form 3528-A to FTB at 916.845.9754, and provide a copy to the buyer.
* Fax is the only delivery method that will be accepted and considered for credit allocation by FTB, as the date and time stamp on the fax will determine the order in which credits are allocated.
* Fax only one completed application per residence with all qualified buyers listed. Do not include information on nonqualified buyers. An incomplete application may delay or prevent credit allocation.
* Do not fax the application to FTB before escrow closes.
* Do not fax the application to FTB more than once. We will process the applications in the order received as quickly as possible.
* Escrow companies should only send one application per fax transmission.
* The buyer keeps a copy of the completed Form 3528-A for their records.
* The Form 3528-A is now available online as a fillable form. Simply fill in all required information, print the form, and sign. If you fill out the form by hand, please print numbers as clearly and neatly as possible using CAPITAL LETTERS and staying between the lines. The faxes can be very hard to read.

Application processing

* The buyer will receive notification of credit allocation from us.
* An allocation of credit will not be issued if:
o The home has been previously occupied.
o The application is not received within one week after the close of escrow.
o The application is received after the total credits available ($100,000,000) have been allocated.

Requirements of the credit

* The home must be a "qualified principal residence" as defined under California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 17059(b)(1). The home must:
o Be a single-family residence, whether detached or attached.
o Never have been previously occupied.
o Be occupied by the taxpayer for a minimum of two years.
o Be eligible for the property tax homeowner’s exemption under California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 218.
* For over three successive taxable years, the total credit allocated among owners that occupy the home must not exceed $10,000. (Multiple qualified buyers that occupy the home will be allocated credit based on the amount paid and their percentage of ownership.)
* Any credit that reduced tax on a tax return must be repaid if the buyer does not occupy the home for at least two years immediately following the purchase date.
* FTB may request documentation to ensure buyers have complied with the requirements of the credit.

Claiming the credit

* The buyer must receive an allocation of credit from us to claim the credit. The credit allocation letter will state the amount they can claim listed by tax year.
* The buyer should refer to Publication 3528 (available by 12/2009) for instructions on claiming the credit.
* The buyer must claim the credit on an original timely filed return, including returns filed on an extension.
* Special rules apply to married/RDP (Registered Domestic Partners) taxpayers filing separately, in which case each spouse is entitled to one-half of the credit, even if their ownership percentages are not equal. For two or more taxpayers who are not married/RDP, the credit amount will have already been allocated to each taxpayer occupying the residence on their respective credit allocation letter.
* If the available credit exceeds the current year net tax, the unused credit may not be carried over to the following year.
* The credit is not refundable.

Definitions

Purchase date:
The date escrow closes.

Qualified buyer:
A taxpayer who purchases a single-family residence, whether detached or attached, that has never been occupied, that is purchased to be the principal residence of the taxpayer for a minimum of two years, and that is eligible for the homeowner’s exemption under California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 218.

Qualified Principal Residence/New Home:
A qualified principal residence means a single-family residence, whether detached or attached, that has never been occupied and is purchased to be the principal residence of the taxpayer for a minimum of two years and is eligible for the property tax homeowner’s exemption.

* Types of residence: Any of the following can qualify if it is your principal residence and is subject to property tax, whether real or personal property: a single family residence, a condominium, a unit in a cooperative project, a houseboat, a manufactured home, or a mobile home.
* Owner-built property: A home constructed by an owner -taxpayer is not eligible for the New Home Credit because the home has not been “purchased.”

Contact us

Phone:

* 888.792.4900 (press 5)
* 916.845.4900 (not toll-free)

Email: wscs.gen@ftb.ca.gov
This is not a secure email address. Please do not send confidential information.